By Nicole Carter, Founder of NEGOTIATiā
Most college athletes don't leave money on the table because the school has none left. They leave it there because they hear "we're at the cap" and stop asking.
The numbers behind that sentence are real. In the first year of direct revenue sharing, 68 schools reached or came within 5% of the $20.5 million cap, according to figures released by the College Sports Commission. Across 307 schools, $1.77 billion went to 34,915 athletes. The cap has since moved to $21.58 million, and a bill that passed the Senate would raise it to $48.8 million, with the added money set aside in a "retention pool" designed to keep current players on their rosters.
For an athlete sitting across from a major program, that headline can feel like a closed door. The school has a compliance office, general counsel, a collective, and a spreadsheet that says the money is spoken for. You have a phone, a parent, and maybe an advisor you met last spring.
I understand why "the budget is maxed" feels final. It isn't. A cap limits one number. It does not limit the conversation.
Tasha is a composite, but her situation is a common one. She is a junior outside hitter on a Power Four volleyball team. Two seasons as a starter, team leader in kills, a steady presence in the locker room. Her revenue-share offer for next year arrives as a one-page summary from the athletic department: a dollar figure, a payment schedule, and a line that reads, "Department allocations are final for the upcoming academic year."
No meeting. No conversation. Just a number and a deadline.
Tasha's first instinct is to sign quickly so she doesn't seem difficult. Her second is to enter the transfer portal out of frustration. Neither one is a plan.
Let's name the size gap plainly. The department has run this process hundreds of times this year. It has standard agreements, a compliance staff that knows every rule, and a collective that knows which donors are tapped out. It has a posture, too: polite, firm, and built to make a one-page summary feel like the last word.
Standard terms are a starting point the institution wrote for itself. They are designed to work for the department across hundreds of athletes, not for any one of them.
Here is what the one-pager doesn't mention.
Roster limits are tighter now. Every spot carries more weight, and every departure has to be filled. If Tasha leaves, the staff has to recruit, evaluate, and pay a replacement, often from the portal, often at a premium, with no guarantee of the same production or chemistry. That cost is real to them even when it never appears on the page.
Programs plan allocations and rosters on a calendar. Retention conversations carry the most weight before the portal window, not after. An athlete who raises questions early and calmly gives the staff time to find room. One who raises them late gives them reasons to move on.
The very idea of a retention pool, money set aside specifically to keep current players, tells you something important about the other side of the table. Keeping proven players is a priority. Your reliability is an asset the program is already trying to protect.
When the headline number truly can't move, plenty else often can: when payments arrive, what happens if an injury keeps her off the court, how outside NIL opportunities are treated, academic and training support, and what is expected of her in return. A capped budget is a reason to widen the conversation, not to end it.
Tasha didn't fire off an angry text or a portal threat. She asked for a meeting.
Before it, she wrote down her contributions in plain terms: starts, statistics, leadership roles, availability. She listed every question the one-pager left unanswered. She decided in advance which terms mattered most to her and which she could live without. And she did her response planning for the two answers she expected to hear: "We're at the cap" and "Everyone gets the same structure."
In the room, she opened with commitment, not complaint. She said she wanted to stay and wanted to understand how her offer was built. Then she asked her questions and quietly listened.
The base number moved only slightly. But Tasha left with a payment schedule that matched her real expenses, clearer protections if an injury sidelined her, and written clarity on her outside NIL opportunities. She had the final paperwork reviewed by a qualified professional before signing. She also left with the relationship intact, and with a staff that now saw her as someone who prepares.
Not a pushover. Not a fight. A better deal.
The program has the lawyers, the policies, and the spreadsheet. You have the skill they recruited and the reliability they are trying to keep.
You earned your place on that roster. The way you negotiate for it deserves the same discipline.
At NEGOTIATiā , we help athletes and their families prepare for high-stakes conversations with the programs, schools, and partners across the table. Our 10-Minute Deal Prep or Walk Me Through Strategy Session can help you map your leverage, plan your questions, and walk in steady.
NEGOTIATiā helps people prepare to negotiate through digital tools and one on one support from world class negotiators. We do not provide tax, legal advice or legal representation.
Ā
50% Complete
Get practical negotiation tips and deal prep insights delivered to your inbox.